-
- 연구보고서
- 이슈+
- 인재채용
- 연구원개요
- 정보공개
- 고객헌장 및 서비스 이행표준
- 학술지
- 농정포커스
- 공지사항
- 조직도
- 공공데이터 개방
- VOC 처리절차
- 글로벌 정보
- KREI논단
- 보도자료
- 원장실
- KREI 정보공개
- 개인정보 처리방침
- 농업농촌국민의식조사
- 주간브리프
- KREI I-zine
- 연구사업소개
- 사업실명제
- CCTV 설치 및 운영안내
- 세미나
- 농업농촌경제동향
- 농경나눔터
- 경영목표
- 연구협력협정 체결현황
- 홈페이지 저작권 정책
- 농식품재정사업리포트
- 동정&행사
- 윤리경영
- 해외출장연수보고
- 이메일 무단수집 금지
- 농업관측정보
- 연구제안
- 신고센터
- 질의응답
- 인권경영
- 체육시설 및 주차장 운영안내
- 뉴스레터
- 임업관측정보
- ESG경영
- KREI CI
- 찾아오시는 길
-
- 연구보고서
- 농촌경제
- 세계농업정보
- 개요
- 자료집
- 채용안내
- 원장 인사말
- 인권경영비전
- 안내
- 경영정보공시
- 국내
- 제1장 총칙
- ESG경영목표및전략
- 수시연구과제
- 논문기고안내
- 해외곡물시장동향
- 정보그림
- 채용공고
- 원장 약력
- 인권경영 추진체계
- 공공데이터 수요조사
- 사전정보공표
- 국외
- 제2장 공정한 직무수행
- ESG경영 추진체계
- 2024년 기본·일반연구보고서
- 논문작성도우미
- 농축산물수입동향(FTA)
- 조사결과
- 친인척 채용인원 공개
- 역대 원장소개
- 인권침해 구제절차 신고
- KREI 핵심정보
- 제3장 부당 이득의 수수 금지 등
- ESG 실천과제 및 추진성과
- 관련자료
- 인권경영 활동/교육
- 참고자료
- KREI RESEARCHER
- 제4장 건전한 공직풍토의 조성
- ESG성과평가
- 인권경영 지침/자료
- 제5장 위반시의 조치 등
- ESG경영위원회 운영기준
- 제6장 보칙
연구보고서
친환경농식품의 생산·소비실태와 시장전망

목차
제1장 서 론
제2장 국내 친환경농산물 생산현황
제3장 친환경농식품의 구매패턴과 소비성향
제4장 국내 친환경농식품의 시장규모 및 전망
제5장 세계의 유기농업 실천현황 및 시장규모
제6장 요약 및 결론
요약문
정부가 DDA·FTA 등에 따른 농산물 시장개방에 대응하여 국내 농산물의 질적 경쟁력 제고를 위해 친환경농업을 적극 육성함에 따라 친환경농산물 생산은 2000~2011년 사이 연평균 40% 이상 급격히 증가해 왔다. 친환경농산물 생산량이 증가함에 따라 농가들은 판로확대와 가격차별화의 어려움을 겪고 있다.
한편, 농산물의 안전성과 건강을 추구하는 웰빙 트렌드가 확산되면서 가족 건강을 위해 친환경농식품을 찾는 소비자가 계속 늘어나고 있다. 소비자는 소비의향은 높은 반면, 가격이 지나치게 높다고 인식하고 있으며, 저렴하면서도 신뢰성이 높은 친환경농산물을 선호하고 있다.
대내외적 여건이 빠르게 변하는 상황에서 최근의 국내 친환경농식품의 생산·소비실태와 국내 친환경농산물의 시장규모 및 전망 정보에 대한 사회적 수요가 증가하고 있다. 이 연구는 최근의 친환경농식품의 생산·소비실태를 분석하고, 대내외적 여건변화를 고려하여 시장규모를 전망함으로써 정책담당자와 친환경농식품 생산·유통·가공업체 종사자들에게 의사결정을 위한 기초자료를 제공하기 위해 수시과제로 추진되었다. 국립농산물품질관리원의 친환경농산물 인증실적을 바탕으로 친환경농산물의 생산실태를 분석하였고, 수도권 거주 20대 이상 주부들을 대상으로 소비실태를 조사·분석하였다. 또, 2020년까지의 시장규모를 전망하였으며, 세계의 유기농업 실천현황을 소개하였다.
This study aims to analyze the recent production and consumption patterns of environment-friendly agri-foods, and to present the prospect for expansion of market volume in consideration of changes in domestic and global circumstances.
The introduction of this report describes the need and goal of this study, a review of previous studies, and the scope of this study. Chapter 2 describes Korea’s current production of environment-friendly agri-foods, including environment-friendly agricultural produce, certified organic processed food, and certified imported organic agricultural products. Chapter 3 describes the purchasing and consumption patterns of environment-friendly agri-foods, which includes environment-friendly agricultural produce and environment- friendly processed food. Chapter 4 presents the market volume and prospects of Korea’s environment-friendly agri-foods. Chapter 5 presents the current production and market volume of global organic agriculture. Chapter 6 presents the summary and conclusion.
As the Korean government positively supported environment-friendly farming as a growth engine of future agriculture, production of environment- friendly agricultural products showed a sharp annual increase of 120% in early 2000s, but the growth rate has significantly slowed down for the last five years (2007~2011). Despite such a slowdown, however, it still continued to grow by approximately 12% every year. In 2011, certified environment- friendly agricultural products increased by 24.5% from the previous year and both organic and chemical-free produce increased by 0.8%. As the production of low-chemical produce decreased by 30.8%, the overall production of environment-friendly products decreased by 11.0% from 2010.
As of 2011, the market volume of certified environment-friendly agricultural products by farming method was 190,912 tons (10.5%) for organically cultivated products, 915,823 tons (50.3%) for products cultivated without use of agricultural chemicals, and 712,493 tons (39.2%) for products produced with low-agricultural chemical agricultural inputs. Non-chemical products clearly make up the largest proportion, which is further divided into 404,825 tons (22.3%) for grains, 433,346 tons (23.8%) for fruits, and 701,894 tons (38.6%) for vegetables which had the largest share.
A consumer survey on environment-friendly agri-foods revealed that more people are willing to buy environment-friendly agricultural products. 41.1% of those who have purchased environment-friendly agricultural produce previously said that they would buy more such fresh products in the future and 74.3% of those who said they have never bought the products said that they will buy them. In the case of environment-friendly processed agri-foods, 52.3% of those who have purchased them before said they will buy more such products and 77.1% of people who have never bought them before said they will buy such products.
The first thing that should be improved for promoting consumption of environment-friendly agri-foods is a means of ‘price reduction’ of both environment-friendly agricultural products and environment-friendly processed agri-foods, followed by access to reasonable shops to buy such products and improvement of the certification system.’ It was revealed that price premiums of organic agricultural products for people who had purchased them were 51~79%, and optimum premiums were 37~52%. The price premium of organic processed food was 2.0 times of conventional products, and the optimum premium was 1.5 times of them. It is assumed that it would be possible to expand the consumption if the price premium is lowered by approximately 20% for organic agricultural products, and by approximately 50% for organic processed food. Meanwhile, it is assumed that people who have not purchased environment-friendly agricultural produce and organic processed food would purchase them if the price premium is lowered by approximately 29% for environment-friendly agricultural produce, and approximately 60% for organic processed food. With respect to the shops for buying environment-friendly agri-foods, large discount stores accounted for the greatest proportion with 40% for both environment-friendly agricultural products and organic processed food.
With respect to contribution to family’s health, environment-friendly agricultural produce accounted for 72.0%, and environment-friendly processed agri-foods accounted for 70.7%. An ordered logit analysis revealed that future consumption would increase if environment-friendly agricultural products are recognized to be contributing much to family’s health. This suggests that it is necessary to bring out and publicize the positive effect of environment- friendly agri-foods for promotion of family’s health.
It is estimated that Korea’s market volume of environment-friendly agricultural products in 2011 decreased by 3.8% from the previous year to 3.26 trillion won. The reason for the reduced market volume is presumed to be due to a decrease in the cultivation areas certified for low-chemical use and due to the implementation of a more strict certification system for environment-friendly agricultural products.
In 2012, it is predicted that the market volume of environment-friendly agricultural products will increase by approximately 13% from 2011 to 3.68 trillion won. The prediction for low-chemical agricultural products is as follows: they will continue to decrease by 2015, but a steady increases of organic and chemical-free agricultural products will contribute to increasing the market volume to 3.98 trillion won in 2013 and to 4.83 trillion won in 2015; and the market volume will increase to 6.9 trillion won in 2020 to account for 20% of the entire transactions of agricultural products.
It is predicted that the volume of certified low-chemical agricultural products will sharply decrease in a short period of time due to the abolition of the low-chemical certification system. Therefore, it is necessary to develop positive policy programs to lead the farmers of low-chemical cultivation to organic and chemical-free cultivation.
It is also necessary to take proper measures in the fields of production and distribution of environment-friendly agri-foods to lower price premiums and promote their consumption, and build up an comprehensive certification system for reliable environment-friendly agri-foods. Also, it is necessary to diversify the items of organic processed food to provide a wider range of selection choices to consumers. Positively utilizing the school catering system as a means for expanding the route for selling environment-friendly agricultural products, and to positively publicize the effect of environment- friendly agri-foods on healthy living and the environment can also contribute towards these goals.
Researchers: Chang-Gil Kim, Hak-Kyun Jeong, and Dong-Hyun Moon
Research period: 2011. 12. - 2012. 2.
E-mail address: changgil@krei.re.kr
저자정보

저자에게 문의

-
상세정보 조회58639
-
좋아요2
-
다운로드287
같은 분야 보고서
-
인구구조 변화에 따른 식품시장 대응과제 (1/2차년도)
박미성2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
한국의 인구변동 추이와 특징 : 식품시장 파급효과의 측면
이상림2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
농식품산업 업(리)사이클링 분야 순환경제 이행 지표 및 환경적 효과 평가 방안 연구
주문솔2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
순환경제 이행을 위한 농식품산업 업(리)사이클링 전략 연구
우병준2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
대체식품 시장 변화에 따른 축산업의 대응 과제
이용건2024.10.30KREI 보고서 -
채식 식품산업의 실태와 성장산업화 전략
박기환2024.10.30KREI 보고서 -
2023 농소모 활동보고서 (한국농촌경제연구원 식품소비 트렌드 모니터)
이계임2023.12.30KREI 보고서 -
2023 식품소비행태조사 통계보고서
이계임2023.12.30KREI 보고서 -
2023 식품소비행태조사 기초분석보고서
이계임2023.12.30KREI 보고서 -
식품수급표 2022
홍연아2023.12.30KREI 보고서
- 다음글
- 이로로 명품브랜드 활성화 대책 연구 용역
- 이전글
- 떫은감의 수출 상품화 및 시장개척 연구